My New Blog Project.

[Quadros]

OK, here's how it is. Since convincing a large group of SPAMERS to accept me as their new god, (http://forums.explosm.net/showthread.php?t=20244) I'm feeling kind of cocky. So I've decided i can argue the case of pretty much anything. Here's the deal, each week you lot, the good people of explosm, come up with the most hopeless arguement possible, and I get a week to produce a fair, reasoned and compelling case for it. Now this has to be an arguement based on opinion, not fact. It's no good asking me to argue that the sky is green, or France doesn't exist, or that Justin Timberlake is a good actor. However apart from that I'm willing to present the case for anything, no matter how morally repugnant or mind boggling.

GOGOGOGOGO

[Derelict]

How was a good idea for someone like Josef Mengele to experiment on children in the Nazi death camps. Auschwitz would be a good start, I suppose. You're a Nazi and you have to convince others to help you. How would you do it, etc.?

And your army sucks.

[Ox]

Getting Spamers to join a bandwagon is like getting fish to swim. Try arguing that the powerful Christian Right-Wing are good for the advancement of the planet.

[Quadros]

Ok I'll do Mendel first, then your Right wing thing.

[Mr. Crow]

Starving children in Africa: the first step in reigning in the human race's rampant growth?

[Spastic]

Quadros feeling cocky? There is a surprise! Argue how American Football is a superior sport than Soccer.

[Quadros]

Must every single one of your posts be a passive aggressive dig at me Spaz? You guys won't see the results of these until probably friday since I have exams all week, but continue pouring in your suggestions. So far no-one's thrown out a particularly troubling one.

[Godly]

If you were forced to eat your best friend(To survive, of course) what part of him would you eat first? Given that he has sacrificed himself so that you can go on living. You must eat him, or else he will have died for nothing. If you require explanations about why and what circumstances brought you to this, you may ask for them.

Give a detailed explanation of what part you will eat, how you will cook it(You have the ability to make a fire) and why you chose it. I'd like a 500 word essay on my desk by friday. Make it good.

[Quadros]

I'm doing Godly's first becvause it's so very un-difficult. I'd fry his brain and eat it because such a large quantity of vitimins and minerals and other helpful shit goes to it.

My other answers will be longer than that because the answers won't be so damn obvious.

[Ox]

Hey, asshole, go tell me what's good about Heath Ledger dying. Saying "he was a shit actor" is not a valid argument. Part two of that question is argue for the Westborough Baptists picketting his funeral.

[HappyPalooza]

Try arguing that the powerful Christian Right-Wing are good for the advancement of the planet.

Also, do just the opposite. Try arguing that the pompus, self-righteous Left-Wings are good for the advancement for the planet.

[Raxo]

Argue how rap/hip-hop is superior to rock genres such as ska or punk. Do this while citing specific rap artists and showing how they are through their lyrics.

[Quadros]

My response to Derelict up. (http://yhtsibigap.blogspot.com/)

I had to cut down the question to fit. Sorry bro.

[Spastic]

You did some decent arguments for the subject, even though it was tough. Nice job Qua... err Fabz!

[Quadros]

This one's just come in from a very good friend of mine in that scary REAL WORLD. (yes I do fucking have them dickmunches).

'How can you defend writing this blog? Are you not morally wronging yourself and the world at large by publishing good arguements for people who actually hold these morally wrong and potentially dangerous views to use in recuiting fellow believers and justifying their beliefs to others? Is it really worth the amusement and ego boost you get from writing them?'

[Benjaman]

Is it really worth the amusement and ego boost you get from writing them?'

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you answered "yes"?

[Audioslave]

Argue how mustaches make the world a terrible place.

Hitler, Stalin, Rivera, and so many more! The mustache makes the man...EVIL! Tell the world how the facial hair is the cause for most of the world's injustices!

[Quadros]

Bumping this because I finally updated it. I might draw a line under the old suggestions if someone comes up with something better.

[timbot]

I read the Christian Right one. I don't think you need to worry about giving great arguments to the other side as your friend suggested. I want to see you do Audio's mustache argument since I can't think of one of my own.

[I_Smell]

This is ridiculous, but I like your enthusiasm!

[Clark]

pro-choice abortion

[Tweek]

It was a good effort but I think it is impossible to defend the neo-conservative Christian right. Point 2 was the only one with any real merit in my opinion.

[SourChicken]

It was a good effort but I think it is impossible to defend the neo-conservative Christian right. Point 2 was the only one with any real merit in my opinion.

This.

The other points were well argued, but didn't really convince me. It was kind of like you were fighting a bear with a match stick. You didn't have much of a chance to begin with, but you gave it a shot.

[timbot]

What would be really interesting is to make a contest of this. Who can make the best argument for these topics. I look at what Quadros did here and think "I could do better than that." But, I don't know if I really want to take the time.

[The_Solipsist]

Argue, using only the Old Testament, the health benefits of sucking the innards out of a dead fetus.

[Quadros]

Now this has to be an arguement based on opinion, not fact. It's no good asking me to argue that the sky is green, or France doesn't exist, or that Justin Timberlake is a good actor.

Might want to read the entire first post before firing of retarded ideas.

[hollywood_maggot]

That is possible a problem with this blog, you're simply putting forth the first set of arguments. Usually, those would be put down fairly easily and vice versa until a good set has been built.

[Mr. Wink]

Argue that movie sequels are always better than the original.

[Clark]

that, sir, is impossible

[SourChicken]

Unless you're talking about Star Wars or Mad Max

[hollywood_maggot]

Argue that movie sequels are always better than the original.

And do it using bad sequels as examples.

[Laurence]

Argue that, for the benefit of humanity, all heterosexuals should be culled meaning homosexuals would be the only remaining people on earth.

[sheepyboy]

you were fighting a bear with a match stick.
Prove that this is better than with any form of gun.

[Pencil]

Prove that this is better than with any form of gun.

Did you read the opening post? The part that states don't post any retarded, impossible cases?