View Full Version : [b]The most pointless study ever?[/b]
beermonster256
09-06-2007, 9:05 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/09/04/dating.mating.ap/index.html
I for one am glad to see that scientists are investing their money in worthwhile studies.
EDIT: And wow I completely failed to get my title in bold. Flame away...
junglebunny
09-06-2007, 9:10 PM
wow, i do like hot girls!
Matterialize
09-06-2007, 9:14 PM
Someone needs to show this to apbu
Quadros
09-06-2007, 9:21 PM
So what you're saying is that given a choice between an ugly chick and a hot chick, I'd pick the hot chick?
LIES!!!
Mr Anorexia
09-06-2007, 9:28 PM
Man the title of this thread is so bold.
beermonster256
09-06-2007, 9:34 PM
Man the title of this thread is so bold.
Isn't it incredible? I mean it's so bold that it even has the code telling it to be bold. If that's not bold, I don't know what bold is. How do you make thread titles in bold anyway? Obviously it isn't the way I thought.
Beefynick
09-06-2007, 9:34 PM
Good to know that scientists are working on worthwhile projects. A cure for cancer, screw it; I want scientific proof that men are attracted to attractive women.
I like hot women? Really I didn't know that. Those scientists are definitely working damn hard.
El Mojado
09-06-2007, 9:40 PM
Damn scientist, just pay two 14 year olds and handout Playboys one with attractive women and the other with ugly women. Its just that simple. Not to mention it cost alot less.
Quadros
09-06-2007, 9:50 PM
yeah but that's peadophilia and it's dirty and immoral and illegal and wrong. Apparently.
Stealth Prawn
09-06-2007, 9:57 PM
Wow... a stunning revelation. I can't believe they found that out. This is going in the history books, right up there with Columbus.
Also, what about gay men? Are they attracted to hot guys, or guys that fall under their "hotness rating?" And what about lesbians?
gtrst7711
09-07-2007, 8:25 AM
Isn't it incredible? I mean it's so bold that it even has the code telling it to be bold. If that's not bold, I don't know what bold is. How do you make thread titles in bold anyway? Obviously it isn't the way I thought.
It looks to me as if the thread title already is bold. That would explain a lot.
And of course guys like hot chicks better. Its a simple matter of recycling. If you stick with hot women, you use less paper bags. It helps the environment.
The Muffin Man
09-07-2007, 6:28 PM
Damn scientist, just pay two 14 year olds and handout Playboys one with attractive women and the other with ugly women. Its just that simple. Not to mention it cost alot less.
I think you could get 14 year olds to do that for free.
Cristo
09-07-2007, 6:34 PM
Hot damn there's something I haven't been told here!!
:facts: :science:
Kwanza
09-07-2007, 10:58 PM
Thanks, tips!
Laced Oysters
09-08-2007, 6:18 PM
DUDE.
They're reading my mind.
Jallen
09-08-2007, 9:23 PM
I personally think this study is faulty. Serion likes hot guys. Case closed.
And to think I was choosing to pick the hot chicks! Now I know it's actually biological! Thanks science guys!
ace76543
09-08-2007, 9:58 PM
I thought he meant /b/ :facts:
ArKaiN
09-08-2007, 10:14 PM
Well now I gotta stop hitting on ugly chicks. DAMN YOU SCIENCE!
Btw you bolded the shit out of that title.
Tyler_Legrand
09-08-2007, 10:48 PM
Oh my God, this thread is the same double sarcasm over and over again.
Traitor King
09-09-2007, 8:34 AM
Man, so its actully true?
Science is sooo useful these days...
Cristo
09-09-2007, 8:38 AM
Now women can't call us shallow, superficial etc. because it's just nature and science. Take that you ugly, man hating, feminist cows!
Tyler_Legrand
09-09-2007, 8:44 AM
Cristo, we've just been scientifically proven to be shallow and superficial.
Cristo
09-09-2007, 9:43 AM
Cristo, we've just been scientifically proven to be shallow and superficial.
Oh right. Yeah, BUT it's not our fault. It's been proven that it's nature and not us, God made us this way so it's not us really choosing to be shallow and superficial it's just our nature. Like it's a woman's nature to bleed for seven days and not die or nag constantly when they're married.
This is a breakthrough in mating
Oh right. Yeah, BUT it's not our fault. It's been proven that it's nature and not us, God made us this way so it's not us really choosing to be shallow and superficial it's just our nature. Like it's a woman's nature to bleed for seven days and not die or nag constantly when they're married.
Five days. Less if you're not fat.
Cristo
09-09-2007, 1:00 PM
Five days. Less if you're not fat.
Damn, no wonder I didn't pass biology.
Oh wait I never took it.
Anthrax
09-09-2007, 3:15 PM
Oh right. Yeah, BUT it's not our fault. It's been proven that it's nature and not us, God made us this way so it's not us really choosing to be shallow and superficial it's just our nature. Like it's a woman's nature to bleed for seven days and not die or nag constantly when they're married.
Just blame it all on God... that bastard.
Yes, talking to someone for five minutes when you're completely sober really makes you know them well enough to want to have their kids.
ShadowDweller
09-10-2007, 3:32 PM
*slaps head* supid scientific reserch! Sounds more like a night out with the Speed dating and everything than a study. A school kid could tell you that.
Tyler_Legrand
09-11-2007, 5:45 AM
Oh right. Yeah, BUT it's not our fault.
Come on. SOMEone's got to take the blame.
Cristo
09-11-2007, 12:53 PM
Come on. SOMEone's got to take the blame.
I blame God, and Adam. Especially Adam. :argh:
SepulNation
09-11-2007, 1:38 PM
...what a bad study.
one should be able to conclude before starting the tests that men will go for the hot girls if they talk for 3 minutes, hell even the ones that fall for personality (they DO exist, somewhere..) would go for the hot girls because 3 minutes is way to short.
TireVengeance
09-11-2007, 6:50 PM
I like the uglies.
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.