[addar800]

addar800.deviantart.com

check it tell me what you think

thanks

[azunder]

You pay £2.50 for a subscription, when your works like that .

You should try doing more than play with the liquefy filter on photoshop, before you call it art.

[Vortex]

Not really my idea of art, to be quite honest. But others might like this kinda thing. To me its just some colours that appear to be liquified (as azunder says), or warped in some way.

They're not the worst pieces of art i've ever seen, but they don't seem very creative. Just my opinion, others might enjoy it

edit:/ azunder, where do you get the idea he's subscribed? I've never understood the difference in symbols infront of peoples names on dA, like ~ or $ etc.

[abbey]

It's crap.

A little tip: don't call something you spent 10 minutes on "art".

[Lamb]

Actually you can call something you spent 3 seconds on art... in photography that is
that being a edited photograph I could withdraw my words... for that is truly, shit

[Veeduck]

There's no real thought, concept, or composition to any of your work.

It seems to me like, "Well I tried this, and it ended up being somewhat aesthetically pleasing, so let's paste it up and offer prints."

Have you sold any prints? 'Cause if you have, I'll eat my foot.

[addar800]

2 on something i didnt sell them but still people printed them

[azunder]

Originally Posted by Vortex

edit:/ azunder, where do you get the idea he's subscribed? I've never understood the difference in symbols infront of peoples names on dA, like ~ or $ etc.

He has a deviant art account, which i think requires a subscription.

[Matterialize]

Originally Posted by azunder

He has a deviant art account, which i think requires a subscription.

It does not.

[Vortex]

Yeah, I didn't think so. You can subscribe, but dA is for free otherwise.

[azunder]

Brb, Making an account

Edit: Some Douche took azunder and hasn't been online for 107 weeks, seriously who else's surname is zunder!

[Lynley]

First I was disappointed that I had to copy and paste instead of just clicking. Really, if you want opinions from people, how hard is it to put www. or http:// in front of something?

Then I was disappointed by only seeing swirls... The same image several times over, with slight variations.

What makes the art disappointing is that it's not very dynamic. Most of us on here aren't terribly into abstract, from what I've gathered. Most of us have also used photoshop or a similar program and realize how very simple it is to create those images.

If you like this style, don't give it up, but try to add to it to make it more interesting (for example: http://artistic1.deviantart.com/art/Swirls-15054921 ). While one can easily see that this image is just the same thing repeated and flipped and repeated more, it's interesting because there's transparent portions, and different colors and sizes, and the composition isn't plain.